android android auto Apple autonomous benchmark Best Bose camera Camry car carplay cars case charging column comparison console controller cops electric Gear Green hybrid interior JBL kick LED mazda mobile mobile phone nature navigation Online panoramic Pure Rides safety smartphone speakers steam Surface touch Toyota Toyota Camry Travel turbo usb vehicle warranty wireless

2018 Mazda 6 GT v Toyota Camry SL V6 comparison

2018 Mazda 6 GT v Toyota Camry SL V6 comparison


Might this be the household automotive battle of head versus coronary heart? The Toyota Camry SL V6 and Mazda 6 GT turboboth stick with a well-worn medium sedan components, though handle to keep away from wanting like carbon copies of one another – each aesthetically and mechanically.

Whereas the Toyota comes throughout as one thing of a salt-of-the-earth providing, thanks partially to its ubiquity on fleets, the Mazda cuts a extra hanging determine as a lure to non-public consumers looking for one thing extra aspirational.

For this pairing, we’ve rounded up the top-spec Camry SL and its highest-output engine, a three.5-litre V6, towards the upper-mid-grade Mazda 6 GT and its new turbocharged petrol four-cylinder engine.

That sees worth between the 2 at an ideal list-price match, though Mazda has a costlier and lavishly outfitted Atenza spec degree greater within the vary that Toyota can’t fairly match as much as.

Though the pairing might have appeared much less possible a era in the past, Toyota has made an enormous leap ahead within the Camry’s presentation and gear. Base-model automobiles will nonetheless attraction to fleets across the nation, however personal house owners will discover extra to love in higher-grade automobiles, together with the reintroduction of a V6 engine.

Mazda, in the meantime, has expanded availability of the CX-9’s turbo petrol engine and created a extra authoritative efficiency halo for the highest of its vary, to go together with the near-premium feel and appear already inherent within the 6.

2018 Mazda 6 GT v Toyota Camry SL V6 comparison

Pricing and specs

Each the Camry SL V6 and Mazda 6 GT turbo kick off with listing pricing of $43,990 plus on-road prices. Within the case of the Mazda, a $1100 costlier diesel can also be out there, whereas the Camry SL has less-expensive petrol-electric hybrid ($3000 much less) and four-cylinder ($4000 much less) variants obtainable.

At that worth, each automobiles come loaded with options together with leather-based seats, steering wheel and kit knob, dual-zone local weather management, electrically adjustable entrance seats, proximity key entry with push-button begin, auto lights and wipers, LED headlights and adaptive cruise management.

Instrumentation is by way of conventional gauges and a small TFT show within the GT, whereas the SL places a bigger 7.Zero-inch show between its speedo and tacho dials. Each embrace color head-up shows projected on the windscreen.

Infotainment in every is delivered by way of Eight.Zero-inch touchscreens preloaded with AM/FM/DAB+ radio, satellite tv for pc navigation, and reversing digital camera show. Mazda additionally features a secondary rotary controller on the centre console to permit on-the-go changes with much less distraction.

Disappointingly, neither has smartphone mirroring (both Apple CarPlay or Android Auto), however the tide is altering at each manufacturers, so the applied sciences look more likely to be added at a later stage. Mazda has introduced its system will probably be retrofittable, however Toyota has but to make an identical announcement.

Divergent specification consists of issues like cooled entrance seats, electrically adjustable steering column, wi-fi telephone charging and a panoramic sunroof within the Camry, however heated entrance and rear seats, adaptive headlights and visitors signal recognition linked to cruise management and velocity limiter within the Mazda 6.

Widespread security methods embrace digital stability and traction management, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert, lane-departure warning and lane-keep help, and ahead collision alert with autonomous emergency braking. The Mazda consists of six airbags whereas the Toyota has seven, however the 6 GT options driver-attention alert that’s lacking from the Camry SL.

5-star ANCAP scores cowl each automobiles, with Toyota’s awarded in 2017 and Mazda choosing up its score in 2012, though up to date security tech added all through its mannequin cycle has stored it updated.

Mannequin Mazda 6 Toyota Camry Variant GT turbo SL V6 Worth $43,990 $43,990 Premium paint $300 $450 Display Eight.Zero-inch Eight.Zero-inch Sat-nav Std Std Apple CarPlay / Android Auto Not out there Not out there Digital camera Rear Rear USB factors four three Audio system 11 – Bose 6 – JBL Mannequin Mazda 6 Toyota Camry Variant GT turbo SL V6 Headlights Adaptive LED LED Proximity key Std Std Seats Leather-based, heated Leather-based, cooled Sunroof No Panoramic AEB Std Std RCTA Std Std Adaptive cruise Std Std Blind-spot monitoring Std Std


As high-grade fashions inside their respective ranges, the Camry SL and 6 GT ship the vary of fittings, fixtures and finishes you’d probably anticipate.

With leather-based trim commonplace in each, together with powered entrance seats, dual-zone local weather management and the like, there’s a suitably premium gear record in each.

Though the Mazda’s design is the oldest of the 2, a 2018 revision sees a brand new sprint design sustain with trendy expectations. Switchgear has a pleasant high-quality heft, metallic trims all through the cabin have a strong feel and appear, with the styling usually coming throughout as understated and stylish.

The Camry is the most recent of the pair from a model-cycle viewpoint, however it’s probably additionally one of many largest modifications to ever shake the Camry in current occasions, taking the inside design from a reasonably fleet-focussed flavour to a extra daring and dramatic design full with a dominating asymmetrical centre stack.

Private preferences might drive your choice right here: Toyota is definitely extra adventurous this time round, however Mazda makes use of supplies with a superior tactility. The 6’s formality echoes that of premium marques, whereas the Camry is probably the most youthful it’s ever been, however can seem much less cohesive.

The Ivory colourway of the Toyota nonetheless feels very old style Toyota; nevertheless, black is accessible in its place if the multi-hued beige-on-tan look isn’t your factor.

Equally, the Mazda’s Pure White inside selection is beautiful to take a look at, and completely modern, however can be a nightmare to maintain clear. Once more, a black choice is accessible and is the steered selection for household use.

Passenger area between the 2 is one other space the place private preferences might steer you to at least one over the opposite. Drivers preferring to take a seat a bit larger will just like the Camry, whereas the Mazda 6 has a low-slung and sportier driving place.

There’s superior head room up entrance within the Camry, although neither is short-changed, however whereas the Mazda has a naturally low roof from entrance to rear, the Camry has area to tuck its sunroof blind, making the rear seats of each rather less spacious than they might in any other case be.

Camry goes upmarket with guide sunshades on the rear doorways (though the powered rear windscreen shade of generations earlier nonetheless hasn’t returned), and although the sunroof has a full-blockout blind, it will be good if there have been a risk of ordering the automotive with no sunroof in any respect.

Infotainment techniques of each are comparatively easy to decipher, although Mazda’s consumer interface is easier and the rotary controller on the centre console makes the system simpler to regulate on the transfer, somewhat than making an attempt to faucet a touchscreen in a shifting car.

Neither system feels fairly as trendy because it ought to – high-definition cell phone shows make these in-car techniques look slightly previous and pixelated by comparison. That’s to say nothing of a scarcity of precise smartphone mirroring for both automotive.

If cargo capability is a main concern, Toyota touts 524L of boot area to Mazda’s 474L. It’s additionally simpler to load the Camry with a bigger boot aperture and decrease boot flooring. Within the cabin, the Camry additionally claims the prize for bigger door bins and a extra beneficiant centre console.

Mannequin Mazda 6 Toyota Camry Variant GT turbo SL V6 Size 4865mm 4905mm Width 1840mm 1840mm Peak 1450mm 1445mm Wheelbase 2830mm 2825mm Cargo area 474L 524L Weight 1607kg 1630kg Towing capability, braked 1600kg 1600kg Towing capability, unbraked 750kg 500kg


As intently matched because the Camry and 6 could also be when it comes to measurement and gear, beneath the bonnet is the place they range probably the most.

Toyota, conservatively, sticks with an enormous naturally aspirated V6 for the Camry’s flagship engine choice, and Mazda has created a turbocharged four-cylinder petrol engine that delivers torque extra like a diesel. Each ship energy to their entrance wheels – Toyota by way of an eight-speed torque converter auto, whereas Mazda makes do with a six-speeder of the identical sort.

Outputs are a give-and-take affair, with Toyota considerably forward on energy and Mazda taking factors on torque. The Camry develops 224kW at 6600rpm and 362Nm at 4700rpm in comparison with the 6 with 170kW at 5000rpm and 420Nm at 2000rpm.

Toyota additionally specifies 95-octane premium unleaded, whereas the Mazda can fortunately get by on 91-octane common unleaded with a minor bump in energy in the event you use 95. Formally, the Camry charges gasoline consumption at Eight.9L/100km and the 6 at 7.6L/100km. On check, biking each automobiles by means of the identical circumstances, the Toyota used 9.5L/100km versus the Mazda’s 7.8L/100km.

With two very totally different engines, the driving really feel of the 2 can also be totally different. Demanding drivers are positive to love the free-revving really feel and vigorous prime finish of the Camry, whereas the extra relaxed Mazda 6 is all about robust and clean waves of torque.

The four-cylinder Mazda can’t match the peaky prime finish of the Camry, nor can it rev as exhausting, however with a steam train-like 420Nm of torque it by no means actually must. Whereas it might ship its greatest at larger revs, even the Camry’s V6 is designed to push extra torque at decrease engine speeds in comparison with four-cylinder Camry variants.

Neither engine disappoints with regards to refinement. The Toyota is whisper quiet virtually on a regular basis, whereas the Mazda provides somewhat extra induction roar beneath load, although by no means to the purpose of sounding unsophisticated.

With a a lot greater peak torque determine, the Mazda can also be capable of lean on its pulling energy, relatively than working its six-speed auto unnecessarily. Comparatively, the Toyota’s eight-speed auto may look superior on specification, however it’s by no means as calm or settled, ceaselessly attempting to find the correct gear, notably in flowing city visitors.

Punch both from a inexperienced mild and neither feels sluggish or sluggish – reward that neither automotive would have deserved simply 12 months in the past, earlier than the present crop of extra highly effective engines got here on-line. The Camry feels as if it really works more durable to realize its outcomes, whereas the Mazda 6 is just calmer however no much less assured.

Mannequin Mazda 6 Toyota Camry Variant GT turbo SL V6 Engine 2.5-litre turbo 4cyl Outputs 170kW/420Nm 224kW/362Nm Gasoline consumption 7.6L/100km Eight.9L/100km Gasoline sort Unleaded Transmission 6-speed auto Eight-speed auto Drive Entrance-wheel drive

Journey and dealing with

This latest era of the Camry represents one thing of a turning level for Toyota, lastly discovering dynamic prowess of a degree just like that of the Mazda 6, which has lengthy been held as one thing of a category benchmark.

Make no mistake, neither one is more likely to ship hot-hatch thrills, however each handle to circulate superbly when put via a collection of corners, relatively than simply being fleet-focussed home equipment.

Once more, Toyota claims technically superior specification because of a double-wishbone unbiased rear, whereas Mazda runs a much less unique multi-link unbiased rear. Each function MacPherson struts up entrance.

Getting energy down on dry roads poses no drawback, although the Toyota and its greater RPM torque peak means it’s simpler to get rolling earlier than wheelspin interrupts the social gathering. Add in moist circumstances and the Mazda will spin an inside entrance wheel much more readily, however nonetheless avoids axle tramp.

The Camry has a stunning pliant experience, capable of take up a lot of the smaller lumps and bumps scattered throughout city tarmac, though greater hits can unsettle the experience by crashing via the cabin.

Steering takes a light-weight and straightforward strategy too – incredible for tight quarters, however uninvolving as velocity rises.

Again to again, the Mazda feels extra tightly managed over small floor imperfections – not tough, just a bit terse. Discover a rougher again street, although, and the Mazda stays far more composed, settled and assured, whereas preserving occupants remoted from the floor under.

Communicative steering includes the driving force, and although there’s extra steering weight it’s by no means under-assisted, making it straightforward to handle at something from parking to freeway speeds.

Though Mazda typically cops criticism for street noise, work over the 6’s lifetime has seen that exact bug ironed out. Each are calm and quiet, however on this match-up the Mazda is extra serene, with the Camry coming throughout only a contact louder and higher-pitched on the go.

Possession prices

Toyota’s capped-price servicing positions it as unbelievable worth with 12-month/15,000km service intervals capped at $195 per service for the primary vendor visits, and including as much as $975 by the top of the capped-price program. Sadly, Toyota’s guarantee help is a bit off the tempo at three years or 100,000km (whichever comes first).

Mazda has lately boosted its guarantee to 5 years/limitless kilometres, however servicing intervals sit at 12 months or 10,000km. Providers alternate between $313 and $341 per go to, and by the top of 5 years the Mazda 6 turbo will accumulate $1894 in service prices.


As unlikely because it might sound at first, these two medium sedans are extremely intently matched. There’s no clear loser, and regardless of which you select, you’ll decide a winner.

As a result of household performance is an important issue, the extra sensible and capacious Camry is more likely to be a greater companion for rising Aussie households with extra boot room and a neater to load and extra spacious rear seat.

Selections of this nature actually must be made as logically and analytically as attainable. The cheaper service prices of the Camry and extra lavish gear record are positive to attraction to your inside accountant – and doubtless your precise accountant too.

The extra emotive styling and extra involving dynamics of the Mazda 6 GT turbo may converse to your coronary heart, however – as unlikely because it might sound – the a lot improved new Camry is a quantifiably higher household sedan.



(perform(d, s, id)
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); = id;
js.src = “//”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
(doc, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));(perform(d, s, id)
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); = id;
js.src = “//”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
(doc, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));(perform(d, s, id)
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); = id;
js.src = “//”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
(doc, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));(perform(d, s, id)
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); = id;
js.src = “//”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
(doc, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));